Apparatus and method for applicant scoring

ABSTRACT

Aspects of this disclosure relate to apparatus and method for applicant scoring. Apparatus includes at least a processor and a memory communicatively connected to the at least a processor. Processor is configured to receive a user-associated data set to be stored on a resource data storage system, parse the user-associated data set into a keyword record, generate a user metric, based on a plurality of weighted values, as a function of the keyword record, receive identification of a posting of a plurality of postings, and match the posting of the plurality of postings to a user as a function of the user metric.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of Non-provisional application Ser. No. 17/690,536, filed on Mar. 9, 2022, and entitled “APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR APPLICANT SCORING,” the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to the field of user data analysis. In particular, the present invention is directed to apparatus and method for applicant scoring.

BACKGROUND

In recent years, cyber security has become increasingly important as much of the world's information is stored on the internet. Present ways of applying to jobs lack in security when storing and transferring job applicant's information. There is a need to securely manage job applications.

SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

In an aspect, an apparatus for data verification for applicant scoring is described. The apparatus includes at least a processor, and a memory communicatively connected to the at least a processor, the memory containing instructions configuring the at least a processor to receive a user-associated data set to be stored on a resource data storage system, transmit the user-associated data set to a validator, receive a verification of the user-associated data set from the validator, receive a plurality of postings and match the validated user-associated data set to a posting of the plurality of postings.

In another aspect, a method for data verification for applicant scoring is described. The method includes receiving, using at least a processor, a user-associated data set to be stored on a resource data storage system, transmitting, using the at least a processor, the user-associated data set to a validator, receiving, using the at least a processor, a verification of the user-associated data set from the validator, receiving, using the at least a processor, a plurality of postings and matching, using the at least a processor, the validated user-associated data set to a posting of the plurality of postings.

These and other aspects and features of non-limiting embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon review of the following description of specific non-limiting embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For the purpose of illustrating the invention, the drawings show aspects of one or more embodiments of the invention. However, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system for securely managing job applications;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary immutable sequential listing;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of exemplary machine-learning processes;

FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary neural network;

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an exemplary node;

FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating an exemplary relationship between fuzzy sets;

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of an exemplary method for scoring applicants;

FIG. 8 is a block diagram of a computing system that can be used to implement any one or more of the methodologies disclosed herein and any one or more portions thereof.

The drawings are not necessarily to scale and may be illustrated by phantom lines, diagrammatic representations and fragmentary views. In certain instances, details that are not necessary for an understanding of the embodiments or that render other details difficult to perceive may have been omitted.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

At a high level, aspects of the present disclosure are directed to apparatuses and methods for scoring applicants. In an embodiment, a scoring apparatus and method for applicants may assist in quickly identifying possible candidates for a posting. Aspects of the present disclosure can be used parse user-associated data for key work information. Aspects of the present disclosure can also be used to help match users to postings. Exemplary embodiments illustrating aspects of the present disclosure are described below in the context of several specific examples.

In an embodiment, methods and systems described herein may perform or implement one or more aspects of a cryptographic system. In one embodiment, a cryptographic system is a system that converts data from a first form, known as “plaintext,” which is intelligible when viewed in its intended format, into a second form, known as “ciphertext,” which is not intelligible when viewed in the same way. Ciphertext may be unintelligible in any format unless first converted back to plaintext. In one embodiment, a process of converting plaintext into ciphertext is known as “encryption.” Encryption process may involve the use of a datum, known as an “encryption key,” to alter plaintext. Cryptographic system may also convert ciphertext back into plaintext, which is a process known as “decryption.” Decryption process may involve the use of a datum, known as a “decryption key,” to return the ciphertext to its original plaintext form. In embodiments of cryptographic systems that are “symmetric,” decryption key is essentially the same as encryption key: possession of either key makes it possible to deduce the other key quickly without further secret knowledge. Encryption and decryption keys in symmetric cryptographic systems may be kept secret and shared only with persons or entities that the user of the cryptographic system wishes to be able to decrypt the ciphertext. One example of a symmetric cryptographic system is the Advanced Encryption Standard (“AES”), which arranges plaintext into matrices and then modifies the matrices through repeated permutations and arithmetic operations with an encryption key.

In embodiments of cryptographic systems that are “asymmetric,” either encryption or decryption key cannot be readily deduced without additional secret knowledge, even given the possession of a corresponding decryption or encryption key, respectively; a common example is a “public key cryptographic system,” in which possession of the encryption key does not make it practically feasible to deduce the decryption key, so that the encryption key may safely be made available to the public. An example of a public key cryptographic system is RSA, in which an encryption key involves the use of numbers that are products of very large prime numbers, but a decryption key involves the use of those very large prime numbers, such that deducing the decryption key from the encryption key requires the practically infeasible task of computing the prime factors of a number which is the product of two very large prime numbers. Another example is elliptic curve cryptography, which relies on the fact that given two points P and Q on an elliptic curve over a finite field, and a definition for addition where A+B=−R, the point where a line connecting point A and point B intersects the elliptic curve, where “0,” the identity, is a point at infinity in a projective plane containing the elliptic curve, finding a number k such that adding P to itself k times results in Q is computationally impractical, given correctly selected elliptic curve, finite field, and P and Q.

In some embodiments, systems and methods described herein produce cryptographic hashes, also referred to by the equivalent shorthand term “hashes.” A cryptographic hash, as used herein, is a mathematical representation of a lot of data, such as files or blocks in a block chain as described in further detail below; the mathematical representation is produced by a lossy “one-way” algorithm known as a “hashing algorithm.” Hashing algorithm may be a repeatable process; that is, identical lots of data may produce identical hashes each time they are subjected to a particular hashing algorithm. Because hashing algorithm is a one-way function, it may be impossible to reconstruct a lot of data from a hash produced from the lot of data using the hashing algorithm. In the case of some hashing algorithms, reconstructing the full lot of data from the corresponding hash using a partial set of data from the full lot of data may be possible only by repeatedly guessing at the remaining data and repeating the hashing algorithm; it is thus computationally difficult if not infeasible for a single computer to produce the lot of data, as the statistical likelihood of correctly guessing the missing data may be extremely low. However, the statistical likelihood of a computer of a set of computers simultaneously attempting to guess the missing data within a useful timeframe may be higher, permitting mining protocols as described in further detail below.

In an embodiment, hashing algorithm may demonstrate an “avalanche effect,” whereby even extremely small changes to lot of data produce drastically different hashes. This may thwart attempts to avoid the computational work necessary to recreate a hash by simply inserting a fraudulent datum in data lot, enabling the use of hashing algorithms for “tamper-proofing” data such as data contained in an immutable ledger as described in further detail below. This avalanche or “cascade” effect may be evinced by various hashing processes; persons skilled in the art, upon reading the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various suitable hashing algorithms for purposes described herein. Verification of a hash corresponding to a lot of data may be performed by running the lot of data through a hashing algorithm used to produce the hash. Such verification may be computationally expensive, albeit feasible, potentially adding up to significant processing delays where repeated hashing, or hashing of large quantities of data, is required, for instance as described in further detail below. Examples of hashing programs include, without limitation, SHA256, a NIST standard; further current and past hashing algorithms include Winternitz hashing algorithms, various generations of Secure Hash Algorithm (including “SHA-1,” “SHA-2,” and “SHA-3”), “Message Digest” family hashes such as “MD4,” “MD5,” “MD6,” and “RIPEMD,” Keccak, “BLAKE” hashes and progeny (e.g., “BLAKE2,” “BLAKE-256,” “BLAKE-512,” and the like), Message Authentication Code (“MAC”)-family hash functions such as PMAC, OMAC, VMAC, HMAC, and UMAC, Polyl305-AES, Elliptic Curve Only Hash (“ECOH”) and similar hash functions, Fast-Syndrome-based (FSB) hash functions, GOST hash functions, the Grøstl hash function, the HAS-160 hash function, the JH hash function, the RadioGatún hash function, the Skein hash function, the Streebog hash function, the SWIFFT hash function, the Tiger hash function, the Whirlpool hash function, or any hash function that satisfies, at the time of implementation, the requirements that a cryptographic hash be deterministic, infeasible to reverse-hash, infeasible to find collisions, and have the property that small changes to an original message to be hashed will change the resulting hash so extensively that the original hash and the new hash appear uncorrelated to each other. A degree of security of a hash function in practice may depend both on the hash function itself and on characteristics of the message and/or digest used in the hash function. For example, where a message is random, for a hash function that fulfills collision-resistance requirements, a brute-force or “birthday attack” may to detect collision may be on the order of O(2^(n/2)) for n output bits; thus, it may take on the order of 2²⁵⁶ operations to locate a collision in a 512 bit output “Dictionary” attacks on hashes likely to have been generated from a non-random original text can have a lower computational complexity, because the space of entries they are guessing is far smaller than the space containing all random permutations of bits. However, the space of possible messages may be augmented by increasing the length or potential length of a possible message, or by implementing a protocol whereby one or more randomly selected strings or sets of data are added to the message, rendering a dictionary attack significantly less effective.

A “secure proof,” as used in this disclosure, is a protocol whereby an output is generated that demonstrates possession of a secret, such as device-specific secret, without demonstrating the entirety of the device-specific secret; in other words, a secure proof by itself, is insufficient to reconstruct the entire device-specific secret, enabling the production of at least another secure proof using at least a device-specific secret. A secure proof may be referred to as a “proof of possession” or “proof of knowledge” of a secret. Where at least a device-specific secret is a plurality of secrets, such as a plurality of challenge-response pairs, a secure proof may include an output that reveals the entirety of one of the plurality of secrets, but not all of the plurality of secrets; for instance, secure proof may be a response contained in one challenge-response pair. In an embodiment, proof may not be secure; in other words, proof may include a one-time revelation of at least a device-specific secret, for instance as used in a single challenge-response exchange.

Secure proof may include a zero-knowledge proof, which may provide an output demonstrating possession of a secret while revealing none of the secret to a recipient of the output; zero-knowledge proof may be information-theoretically secure, meaning that an entity with infinite computing power would be unable to determine secret from output. Alternatively, zero-knowledge proof may be computationally secure, meaning that determination of secret from output is computationally infeasible, for instance to the same extent that determination of a private key from a public key in a public key cryptographic system is computationally infeasible. Zero-knowledge proof algorithms may generally include a set of two algorithms, a prover algorithm, or “P,” which is used to prove computational integrity and/or possession of a secret, and a verifier algorithm, or “V” whereby a party may check the validity of P. Zero-knowledge proof may include an interactive zero-knowledge proof, wherein a party verifying the proof must directly interact with the proving party; for instance, the verifying and proving parties may be required to be online, or connected to the same network as each other, at the same time. Interactive zero-knowledge proof may include a “proof of knowledge” proof, such as a Schnorr algorithm for proof on knowledge of a discrete logarithm. in a Schnorr algorithm, a prover commits to a randomness r, generates a message based on r, and generates a message adding r to a challenge c multiplied by a discrete logarithm that the prover is able to calculate; verification is performed by the verifier who produced c by exponentiation, thus checking the validity of the discrete logarithm. Interactive zero-knowledge proofs may alternatively or additionally include sigma protocols. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various alternative interactive zero-knowledge proofs that may be implemented consistently with this disclosure.

Alternatively, zero-knowledge proof may include a non-interactive zero-knowledge, proof, or a proof wherein neither party to the proof interacts with the other party to the proof; for instance, each of a party receiving the proof and a party providing the proof may receive a reference datum which the party providing the proof may modify or otherwise use to perform the proof. As a non-limiting example, zero-knowledge proof may include a succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (ZK-SNARKS) proof, wherein a “trusted setup” process creates proof and verification keys using secret (and subsequently discarded) information encoded using a public key cryptographic system, a prover runs a proving algorithm using the proving key and secret information available to the prover, and a verifier checks the proof using the verification key; public key cryptographic system may include RSA, elliptic curve cryptography, ElGamal, or any other suitable public key cryptographic system. Generation of trusted setup may be performed using a secure multiparty computation so that no one party has control of the totality of the secret information used in the trusted setup; as a result, if any one party generating the trusted setup is trustworthy, the secret information may be unrecoverable by malicious parties. As another non-limiting example, non-interactive zero-knowledge proof may include a Succinct Transparent Arguments of Knowledge (ZK-STARKS) zero-knowledge proof. In an embodiment, a ZK-STARKS proof includes a Merkle root of a Merkle tree representing evaluation of a secret computation at some number of points, which may be 1 billion points, plus Merkle branches representing evaluations at a set of randomly selected points of the number of points; verification may include determining that Merkle branches provided match the Merkle root, and that point verifications at those branches represent valid values, where validity is shown by demonstrating that all values belong to the same polynomial created by transforming the secret computation. In an embodiment, ZK-STARKS does not require a trusted setup.

Zero-knowledge proof may include any other suitable zero-knowledge proof. Zero-knowledge proof may include, without limitation bulletproofs. Zero-knowledge proof may include a homomorphic public-key cryptography (hPKC)-based proof. Zero-knowledge proof may include a discrete logarithmic problem (DLP) proof. Zero-knowledge proof may include a secure multi-party computation (MPC) proof. Zero-knowledge proof may include, without limitation, an incrementally verifiable computation (IVC). Zero-knowledge proof may include an interactive oracle proof (IOP). Zero-knowledge proof may include a proof based on the probabilistically checkable proof (PCP) theorem, including a linear PCP (LPCP) proof. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various forms of zero-knowledge proofs that may be used, singly or in combination, consistently with this disclosure.

In an embodiment, secure proof is implemented using a challenge-response protocol. In an embodiment, this may function as a one-time pad implementation; for instance, a manufacturer or other trusted party may record a series of outputs (“responses”) produced by a device possessing secret information, given a series of corresponding inputs (“challenges”), and store them securely. In an embodiment, a challenge-response protocol may be combined with key generation. A single key may be used in one or more digital signatures as described in further detail below, such as signatures used to receive and/or transfer possession of crypto-currency assets; the key may be discarded for future use after a set period of time. In an embodiment, varied inputs include variations in local physical parameters, such as fluctuations in local electromagnetic fields, radiation, temperature, and the like, such that an almost limitless variety of private keys may be so generated. Secure proof may include encryption of a challenge to produce the response, indicating possession of a secret key. Encryption may be performed using a private key of a public key cryptographic system, or using a private key of a symmetric cryptographic system; for instance, trusted party may verify response by decrypting an encryption of challenge or of another datum using either a symmetric or public-key cryptographic system, verifying that a stored key matches the key used for encryption as a function of at least a device-specific secret. Keys may be generated by random variation in selection of prime numbers, for instance for the purposes of a cryptographic system such as RSA that relies prime factoring difficulty. Keys may be generated by randomized selection of parameters for a seed in a cryptographic system, such as elliptic curve cryptography, which is generated from a seed. Keys may be used to generate exponents for a cryptographic system such as Diffie-Helman or ElGamal that are based on the discrete logarithm problem.

Embodiments of apparatuses and methods described herein may generate, evaluate, and/or utilize digital signatures. A “digital signature,” as used herein, includes a secure proof of possession of a secret by a signing device, as performed on provided element of data, known as a “message.” A message may include an encrypted mathematical representation of a file or other set of data using the private key of a public key cryptographic system. Secure proof may include any form of secure proof as described in further detail below, including without limitation encryption using a private key of a public key cryptographic system as described above. Signature may be verified using a verification datum suitable for verification of a secure proof; for instance, where secure proof is enacted by encrypting message using a private key of a public key cryptographic system, verification may include decrypting the encrypted message using the corresponding public key and comparing the decrypted representation to a purported match that was not encrypted; if the signature protocol is well-designed and implemented correctly, this means the ability to create the digital signature is equivalent to possession of the private decryption key and/or device-specific secret. Likewise, if a message making up a mathematical representation of file is well-designed and implemented correctly, any alteration of the file may result in a mismatch with the digital signature; the mathematical representation may be produced using an alteration-sensitive, reliably reproducible algorithm, such as a hashing algorithm as described above. A mathematical representation to which the signature may be compared may be included with signature, for verification purposes; in other embodiments, the algorithm used to produce the mathematical representation may be publicly available, permitting the easy reproduction of the mathematical representation corresponding to any file.

In some embodiments, digital signatures may be combined with or incorporated in digital certificates. In one embodiment, a digital certificate is a file that conveys information and links the conveyed information to a “certificate authority” that is the issuer of a public key in a public key cryptographic system. Certificate authority in some embodiments contains data conveying the certificate authority's authorization for the recipient to perform a task. The authorization may be the authorization to access a given datum. The authorization may be the authorization to access a given process. In some embodiments, the certificate may identify the certificate authority. The digital certificate may include a digital signature.

In some embodiments, a third party such as a certificate authority (CA) is available to verify that the possessor of the private key is a particular entity; thus, if the certificate authority may be trusted, and the private key has not been stolen, the ability of an entity to produce a digital signature confirms the identity of the entity and links the file to the entity in a verifiable way. Digital signature may be incorporated in a digital certificate, which is a document authenticating the entity possessing the private key by authority of the issuing certificate authority and signed with a digital signature created with that private key and a mathematical representation of the remainder of the certificate. In other embodiments, digital signature is verified by comparing the digital signature to one known to have been created by the entity that purportedly signed the digital signature; for instance, if the public key that decrypts the known signature also decrypts the digital signature, the digital signature may be considered verified. Digital signature may also be used to verify that the file has not been altered since the formation of the digital signature.

Referring now to FIG. 1 , an exemplary embodiment of an apparatus 100 for applicant scoring using an immutable sequential listing. System includes a processor 104. Processor 104 may include any computing device as described in this disclosure, including without limitation a microcontroller, microprocessor, digital signal processor (DSP) and/or system on a chip (SoC) as described in this disclosure. Processor 104 may include, be included in, and/or communicate with a mobile device such as a mobile telephone or smartphone. Processor 104 may include a single computing device operating independently, or may include two or more computing device operating in concert, in parallel, sequentially or the like; two or more computing devices may be included together in a single computing device or in two or more computing devices. Processor 104 may interface or communicate with one or more additional devices as described below in further detail via a network interface device. Network interface device may be utilized for connecting processor 104 to one or more of a variety of networks, and one or more devices. Examples of a network interface device include, but are not limited to, a network interface card (e.g., a mobile network interface card, a LAN card), a modem, and any combination thereof. Examples of a network include, but are not limited to, a wide area network (e.g., the Internet, an enterprise network), a local area network (e.g., a network associated with an office, a building, a campus or other relatively small geographic space), a telephone network, a data network associated with a telephone/voice provider (e.g., a mobile communications provider data and/or voice network), a direct connection between two computing devices, and any combinations thereof. A network may employ a wired and/or a wireless mode of communication. In general, any network topology may be used. Information (e.g., data, software etc.) may be communicated to and/or from a computer and/or a computing device. Processor 104 may include but is not limited to, for example, a computing device or cluster of computing devices in a first location and a second computing device or cluster of computing devices in a second location. Processor 104 may include one or more computing devices dedicated to data storage, security, distribution of traffic for load balancing, and the like. Processor 104 may distribute one or more computing tasks as described below across a plurality of computing devices of computing device, which may operate in parallel, in series, redundantly, or in any other manner used for distribution of tasks or memory between computing devices. Processor 104 may be implemented using a “shared nothing” architecture in which data is cached at the worker, in an embodiment, this may enable scalability of apparatus 100 and/or computing device.

With continued reference to FIG. 1 , processor 104 may be designed and/or configured to perform any method, method step, or sequence of method steps in any embodiment described in this disclosure, in any order and with any degree of repetition. For instance, processor 104 may be configured to perform a single step or sequence repeatedly until a desired or commanded outcome is achieved; repetition of a step or a sequence of steps may be performed iteratively and/or recursively using outputs of previous repetitions as inputs to subsequent repetitions, aggregating inputs and/or outputs of repetitions to produce an aggregate result, reduction or decrement of one or more variables such as global variables, and/or division of a larger processing task into a set of iteratively addressed smaller processing tasks. Processor 104 may perform any step or sequence of steps as described in this disclosure in parallel, such as simultaneously and/or substantially simultaneously performing a step two or more times using two or more parallel threads, processor cores, or the like; division of tasks between parallel threads and/or processes may be performed according to any protocol suitable for division of tasks between iterations. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which steps, sequences of steps, processing tasks, and/or data may be subdivided, shared, or otherwise dealt with using iteration, recursion, and/or parallel processing.

With continued reference to FIG. 1 , processor 104 of apparatus 100 receives a user-associated data set 108 from a user 112. As used herein, a “user-associated data set” is a set of data about a user. A user 112 may be a job seeker or a job offerer. Apparatus 100 may be utilized by a job seeker. Apparatus 100 may also be utilized by a job offerer. A “job seeker,” as used herein, is a person who is looking for work and/or employment. In an embodiment, a job seeker may include a job applicant or the like. A job seeker may match with a job offerer for a desired job. This match may often times utilizes user-associated data set 108 to determine a proper fit. A “job offerer”, as used herein, is a person or entity seeking to fill a job role. In an embodiment, a job offerer may include an employer, a recruiting agency, or the like. Apparatus 100 may match a job offerer to a job seeker using methods discussed below. User-associated data set 108 may include at least a user-specific historical record. As used herein, a “user-specific historical record” is record or document containing information about the background of a user. A user-specific historical record may include a written or video resume. As used in this disclosure, a “resume” is an item of media that includes content representative or communicative of the jobseeker. A resume may include personally identifiable information about the jobseeker such as the jobseeker's name, address, phone number, etc. A resume may include information about the jobseeker's employment history, education, skills, etc. A resume may be a video resume. A “video resume”, as used in this disclosure, is a resume that represents the jobseeker directly, in person, by video. A video resume may be any video in visual and/or audio form to provide a recording promoting a jobseeker. User-associated data set 108 may include visual content such that user-specific historical record may include visual content. Visual content may be in the form of written content or a video. Video may include visual content that is non-verbal. For example and without limitation, video may include change in intonation and/or stress in speaker's voice, expression of emotion, interjection, and the like.

With continued reference to FIG. 1 , user-associated data set is stored in a resource data storage system. As used herein, a “resource data storage system” is a database communicatively connected to processor 104 or remotely connected, that contains information on a user 112. Resource data storage system 116 may be consistent with a database as discussed below. In an embodiment, information may comprise of user-associated data set 108, other job information, education information, and the like. Resource data storage system 116 may be stored on an immutable sequential listing 200, for instance and without limitation as discussed in further detail in FIG. 2 .

With continued reference to FIG. 1 , processor 104 may be configured to transcribe a video resume of the user-associated data set 108. The process may include using word recognition software to create a transcript of video resume, such as, automatic speech recognition, natural language processing, optical character recognition, and the like. A “transcript”, as used herein, is a written document of text based on the audio from a video. In some embodiments, a transcript may also contain information about occurrences in the video, such as gestures, a manner of speaking, pauses in speaking, and the like. In some embodiments, a transcript may include textual descriptions of the video, such as the setting, subject of the video, background, and the like. Additionally, processor may parse video resume for key words relating to employment. This is discussed in further detail below. For example, if a keyword is for a “truck driver” and video resume contains the phrase “commercial driver's license (CDL)” at 3 different points throughout video resume, then processor 104 may extract those segments of the video that mention CDL and transcribe them. This may include the use of machine learning, to identify and learn related words and/or phrases that may be associated with credentials, skills, and traits. In some embodiments, transcribing the user-associated data set 108 may include using automatic speech recognition to recognize spoken words and convert the words into text. In some embodiments, transcribing the user-associated data set 108 may include using optical character recognition to convert text into machine encoded text. Both of which are described further below.

In some cases, processor 104 may include audiovisual speech recognition (AVSR) processes to recognize verbal content in video resumes. For example, processor 104 may use image content to aid in recognition of audible verbal content such as viewing user move their lips to speak on video to process the audio content of video resume. AVSR may use image component to aid the overall translation of the audio verbal content of video resumes. In some embodiments, AVSR may include techniques employing image processing capabilities in lip reading to aid speech recognition processes. In some cases, AVSR may be used to decode (i.e., recognize) indeterministic phonemes or help in forming a preponderance among probabilistic candidates. In some cases, AVSR may include an audio-based automatic speech recognition process and an image-based automatic speech recognition process. AVSR may combine results from both processes with feature fusion. Audio-based speech recognition process may analysis audio according to any method described herein, for instance using a Mel frequency cepstrum coefficients (MFCCs) and/or log-Mel spectrogram derived from raw audio samples. Image-based speech recognition may perform feature recognition to yield an image vector. In some cases, feature recognition may include any feature recognition process described in this disclosure, for example a variant of a convolutional neural network. In some cases, AVSR employs both an audio datum and an image datum to recognize verbal content. For instance, audio vector and image vector may each be concatenated and used to predict speech made by a user, who is ‘on camera.’

With continued reference to FIG. 1 , in some embodiments, user-associated data set 108 may include or otherwise represent verbal content. For instance, written or visual verbal content may be included within user-associated data set 108. In some cases, processor 104 may be configured to recognize at least a keyword as a function of visual verbal content. In some cases, recognizing at least keyword may include optical character recognition. As used in this disclosure, a “keyword” is any meaningful word or syntax. In some cases, processor 104 may transcribe a majority or even substantially all verbal content from resume video. Transcribed resume may be used to compare job seeker information to a posting 120, which is discussed in detail below.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , in some embodiments, optical character recognition or optical character reader (OCR) includes automatic conversion of images of written (e.g., typed, handwritten or printed text) into machine-encoded text. In some cases, recognition of at least a keyword from resume may include one or more processes, including without limitation optical character recognition (OCR), optical word recognition, intelligent character recognition, intelligent word recognition, and the like. In some cases, OCR may recognize written text, one glyph or character at a time. In some cases, optical word recognition may recognize written text, one word at a time, for example, for languages that use a space as a word divider. In some cases, intelligent character recognition (ICR) may recognize written text one glyph or character at a time, for instance by employing machine-learning processes. In some cases, intelligent word recognition (IWR) may recognize written text, one word at a time, for instance by employing machine-learning processes.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , in some cases OCR may be an “offline” process, which analyses a static document or image frame. In some cases, handwriting movement analysis can be used as input to handwriting recognition. For example, instead of merely using shapes of glyphs and words, this technique may capture motions, such as the order in which segments are drawn, the direction, and the pattern of putting the pen down and lifting it. This additional information can make handwriting recognition more accurate. In some cases, this technology may be referred to as “online” character recognition, dynamic character recognition, real-time character recognition, and intelligent character recognition.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , in some cases, OCR processes may employ pre-processing of user-associated data set 108. Pre-processing process may include without limitation de-skew, de-speckle, binarization, line removal, layout analysis or “zoning,” line and word detection, script recognition, character isolation or “segmentation,” and normalization. In some cases, a de-skew process may include applying a transform (e.g., homography or affine transform) to user-associated data set 108 to align text. In some cases, a de-speckle process may include removing positive and negative spots and/or smoothing edges. In some cases, a binarization process may include converting an image from color or greyscale to black-and-white (i.e., a binary image). Binarization may be performed as a simple way of separating text (or any other desired image component) from a background of image component. In some cases, binarization may be required for example if an employed OCR algorithm only works on binary images. In some cases, a line removal process may include removal of non-glyph or non-character imagery (e.g., boxes and lines). In some cases, a layout analysis or “zoning” process may identify columns, paragraphs, captions, and the like as distinct blocks. In some cases, a line and word detection process may establish a baseline for word and character shapes and separate words, if necessary. In some cases, a script recognition process may, for example in multilingual documents, identify script allowing an appropriate OCR algorithm to be selected. In some cases, a character isolation or “segmentation” process may separate signal characters, for example character-based OCR algorithms. In some cases, a normalization process may normalize aspect ratio and/or scale of image component.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , in some embodiments an OCR process will include an OCR algorithm. Exemplary OCR algorithms include matrix matching process and/or feature extraction processes. Matrix matching may involve comparing an image to a stored glyph on a pixel-by-pixel basis. In some case, matrix matching may also be known as “pattern matching,” “pattern recognition,” and/or “image correlation.” Matrix matching may rely on an input glyph being correctly isolated from the rest of the image component. Matrix matching may also rely on a stored glyph being in a similar font and at a same scale as input glyph. Matrix matching may work best with typewritten text.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , in some embodiments, an OCR process may include a feature extraction process. In some cases, feature extraction may decompose a glyph into at least a feature 128. Exemplary non-limiting features may include corners, edges, lines, closed loops, line direction, line intersections, and the like. In some cases, feature extraction may reduce dimensionality of representation and may make the recognition process computationally more efficient. In some cases, extracted feature can be compared with an abstract vector-like representation of a character, which might reduce to one or more glyph prototypes. General techniques of feature detection in computer vision are applicable to this type of OCR. In some embodiments, machine-learning process like nearest neighbor classifiers (e.g., k-nearest neighbors algorithm) can be used to compare image features with stored glyph features and choose a nearest match. OCR may employ any machine-learning process described in this disclosure, for example machine-learning processes described with reference to FIG. 5 . Exemplary non-limiting OCR software includes Cuneiform and Tesseract. Cuneiform is a multi-language, open-source optical character recognition system originally developed by Cognitive Technologies of Moscow, Russia. Tesseract is free OCR software originally developed by Hewlett-Packard of Palo Alto, Calif., United States.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , in some cases, OCR may employ a two-pass approach to character recognition. Second pass may include adaptive recognition and use letter shapes recognized with high confidence on a first pass to recognize better remaining letters on the second pass. In some cases, two-pass approach may be advantageous for unusual fonts or low-quality image components where visual verbal content may be distorted. Another exemplary OCR software tool include OCRopus. OCRopus development is led by German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence in Kaiserslautern,

Still referring to FIG. 1 , in some cases, OCR may include post-processing. For example, OCR accuracy can be increased, in some cases, if output is constrained by a lexicon. A lexicon may include a list or set of words that are allowed to occur in a document. In some cases, a lexicon may include, for instance, all the words in the English language, or a more technical lexicon for a specific field. In some cases, an output stream may be a plain text stream or file of characters. In some cases, an OCR process may preserve an original layout of visual verbal content. In some cases, near-neighbor analysis can make use of co-occurrence frequencies to correct errors, by noting that certain words are often seen together. For example, “Washington, D.C.” is generally far more common in English than “Washington DOC.” In some cases, an OCR process may make us of a priori knowledge of grammar for a language being recognized. For example, grammar rules may be used to help determine if a word is likely to be a verb or a noun. Distance conceptualization may be employed for recognition and classification. For example, a Levenshtein distance algorithm may be used in OCR post-processing to further optimize results. Additional disclosure related to video resumes can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/582,070, filed on Jan. 24, 2022, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PARSING AND COMPARING VIDEO RESUME DUPLICATIONS,” entirety of which incorporated herein by reference.

With continued reference to FIG. 1 , user-associated data set 108 may be uploaded electronically to a network. Processor 104 is communicatively connected to a network. Network may include, but not limited to, a cloud network, a mesh network, or the like. By way of example, a “cloud-based” system, as that term is used herein, can refer to a system which includes software and/or data which is stored, managed, and/or processed on a network of remote servers hosted in the “cloud”, e.g., via the Internet, rather than on local severs or personal computers. A “mesh network” as used in this disclosure is a local network topology in which the infrastructure processor 104 connect directly, dynamically, and non-hierarchically to as many other computing devices as possible. A “network topology” as used in this disclosure is an arrangement of elements of a communication network. Network may use an immutable sequential listing to securely store user-specific historical record. Blockchain, as used in this disclosure, are permanent, uneditable digital records of information, otherwise known as immutable sequential listings. An “immutable sequential listing,” as used in this disclosure, is a data structure that places data entries in a fixed sequential arrangement, such as a temporal sequence of entries and/or blocks thereof, where the sequential arrangement, once established, cannot be altered or reordered. An immutable sequential listing may be, include and/or implement an immutable ledger, where data entries that have been posted to the immutable sequential listing cannot be altered.

Still referencing FIG. 1 , the user-associated data set may include a verification. A “verification” as used herein, is the establishment of truth. In an embodiment, verification of a user historical record may be used to ensure that a job seeker has an accurate work history, education history, or the like. Such verification may include transmitting the at least a historical record to a validator and receiving a verification. A “validator” as used herein, is an entity or system that verifies information. A validator may be a third-party validator. A validator may be on an immutable sequential listing. Verification may be digitally signed. In an embodiment, a validator may sign the verification with a private key that may be decrypted with a public key. Digitally signed verifications may insure the validity of the verification. Apparatus may include a data integrity validator to validate user-specific historical record. As used herein, a “data integrity validator” is a validator that validates and authenticates data. Data integrity validator may be implemented as any hardware or software module as described above. For instance, and without limitation, data integrity validator operating on the processor 104 may be designed and configured to validate user-specific historical record, wherein validating further comprises transmitting, to at least a third-party validator device of stored requestor information a validation request, receiving, from at least a third-party validator device a validation record including a third-party digital signature validating the at least an encrypted data record, authenticating the third-party digital signature, and validating the at least an encrypted data record as a function of the validation record. As a further non-limiting example, data integrity validator may be designed and configured to validate stored requestor information, wherein validating further comprises transmitting to the at least a third-party validator device of stored requestor information a validation request, the validation providing access to at least a datum of the data record to the at least a third-party validator device, receiving from the at least a third-party validator device a validation record including a third-party digital signature validating the at least an encrypted data record, authenticating the third-party digital signature, and validating the at least an encrypted data record as a function of the validation record. Additionally, processor 104 may match/compare a validated user-specific historical record and/or user-specific data set 108 to a posting 120. Comparisons are discussed in further detail below.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 1 , processor 104 is configured to parse the user-associated data set 108 into a keyword record 124. As used herein, a “keyword record” is a data set that relates a keyword to data relating to the keyword. For example, a keyword record may relate a job category to the length of work experience, type of work experience, work achievements, difficulties at a job, or the like. Difficulties at a job may include being fired, being reprimanded, or the like. Type of work experience may include entry level work, managerial work, or the like. Processor 104 may use a language processor module to parse user-associated data set 108. The language processing module 140 may be configured to extract, from the one or more documents, one or more words. One or more words may include, without limitation, strings of one or more characters, including without limitation any sequence or sequences of letters, numbers, punctuation, diacritic marks, engineering symbols, geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T) symbols, chemical symbols and formulas, spaces, whitespace, and other symbols, including any symbols usable as textual data as described above. Textual data may be parsed into tokens, which may include a simple word (sequence of letters separated by whitespace) or more generally a sequence of characters as described previously. The term “token,” as used herein, refers to any smaller, individual groupings of text from a larger source of text; tokens may be broken up by word, pair of words, sentence, or other delimitation. These tokens may in turn be parsed in various ways. Textual data may be parsed into words or sequences of words, which may be considered words as well. Textual data may be parsed into “n-grams”, where all sequences of n consecutive characters are considered. Any or all possible sequences of tokens or words may be stored as “chains”, for example for use as a Markov chain or Hidden Markov Model. In some cases, parsing a user-associated data set 108 may include using a number of querying tools, including without limitation keywords (as described above), field-restricted search, Boolean queries, phrase search, concept search, concordance search, proximity search, regular expression, fuzzy search, wildcard search, and the like. In some cases, keywords may be used to perform a query. In some cases, a document (or trained indexers) may supply a list of words that describe subject of the document, including without limitation synonyms of words that describe the subject. In some cases, keywords may improve recall, for instance if the keyword list includes a keyword that is not in text of a document. In some cases, querying tools may include field-restricted search. A field-restricted search may allow a queries scope to be limited to within a particular field within a stored data record, such as “Title” or “Author.” In some cases, a query tool may include Boolean queries. Searches that use Boolean operators (for example, “encyclopedia” AND “online” NOT “Encarta”) can dramatically increase precision of a search. In some cases, an AND operator may say, in effect, “Do not retrieve any document unless it contains both of these terms.” In some cases, a NOT operator may say, in effect, “Do not retrieve any document that contains this word.” In some cases, a retrieval list retrieving too few documents, may prompt and OR operator to be used in place of an AND operator to increase recall; consider, for example, “encyclopedia” AND “online” OR “Internet” NOT “Encarta”. This search will retrieve documents about online encyclopedias that use the term “Internet” instead of “online.” In some cases, search precision and recall are interdependent and negatively correlated in text searching. In some cases, a query tool may include phrase search. In some cases, a phrase search may match only those documents that contain a specified phrase. In some cases, a query tool may include a concept search. In some cases, a concept search may be based on multi-word concepts, for example compound term processing. In some cases, a query tool may include a concordance search. In some cases, a concordance search may produce an alphabetical list of all principal words that occur in a text and may include their immediate context. In some cases, a query tool may include a proximity search. In some cases, a proximity search matches only those documents that contain two or more words that are separated by a specified number of words, are in the same sentence, or an in the same paragraph. A query tool may include a regular expression. In some cases, a regular expression may employ a complex but powerful querying syntax that can be used to specify retrieval conditions with precision, for instance database syntax. A query tool may include a fuzzy search. In some cases, a fuzzy search may search for a document that matches given terms while allowing for some variation around them. In some cases, a query tool may include a wildcard search. In some cases, a wildcard search may substitute one or more characters in a search query for a wildcard character such as an asterisk. For example, using a wildcard, such as an asterisk, in a search query “s*n” will search for terms inclusive of “sin,” “son,” “sun,” and the like.

Processor 104 may use a machine-learning module 144, discussed in further detail in FIG. 3 , to determine a keyword record 124. Machine-learning module 144 may use keywords to parse the user-associated data set 108 and classify the relevant data into a keyword record 124. As used in this disclosure, a “keyword” is an element of word or syntax used to identify and/or match elements to each other. Classifying the user-associated data set 108, which includes transcribed video resumes, may include a classification algorithm or classifier to output matches between the keywords and the data set as a keyword record 124. A “classifier,” as used in this disclosure is a machine-learning model, such as a mathematical model, neural net, or program generated by a machine learning algorithm known as a “classification algorithm,” as described in further detail below, that sorts of inputs into categories or bins of data, outputting the categories or bins of data and/or labels associated therewith. A classifier may be configured to output at least a datum that labels or otherwise identifies a set of data that are clustered together, found to be close under a distance metric as described below, or the like. Processor 104 may generate keyword classifier 136 using a classification algorithm, defined as a process whereby processor 104 derives keyword classifier 136 from training data. Training data may include previous user-associated data sets and keyword matches. For example, previous data sets may associate “lawyer” with words from a user-associated data set 108 such as attorney, solicitor, counselor, advocate, of council, attorney-at-law, and the like. In another example, words found in user-associated data sets such as lead, managed, or the like, may be associated with a keyword such as “managerial position”. Classification may be performed using, without limitation, linear classifiers such as without limitation logistic regression and/or naive Bayes classifiers, nearest neighbor classifiers such as k-nearest neighbors classifiers, support vector machines, least squares support vector machines, fisher's linear discriminant, quadratic classifiers, decision trees, boosted trees, random forest classifiers, learning vector quantization, and/or neural network-based classifiers. In some embodiments, keyword classifier 136 may take the data collected from user-associated data sets as algorithm inputs, wherein the training data includes a database of previous user-associated data sets such as resumes, keyword records, transcription of the plurality of video resumes, and output data from a language processing module, to generate a keyword record 124 of a user-associated data set 108. For example, video resume once transcribed may be put through keyword classifier 136 to generate a keyword record 124 where keywords are matched to respective data, such as “nursing” with data from the user-associated dataset 108 associated with a user's nursing background. Keyword record may also include keywords such as “fired” and associated keyword record of times a user 108 may be fired. A record of a user 112 being fired may be validated by a third party validator as discussed above.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , processor 104 may be configured to generate a classifier using a Naïve Bayes classification algorithm. Naïve Bayes classification algorithm generates classifiers by assigning class labels to problem instances, represented as vectors of element values. Class labels are drawn from a finite set. Naïve Bayes classification algorithm may include generating a family of algorithms that assume that the value of a particular element is independent of the value of any other element, given a class variable. Naïve Bayes classification algorithm may be based on Bayes Theorem expressed as P(A/B)=P(B/A) P(A)÷P(B), where P(A/B) is the probability of hypothesis A given data B also known as posterior probability; P(B/A) is the probability of data B given that the hypothesis A was true; P(A) is the probability of hypothesis A being true regardless of data also known as prior probability of A; and P(B) is the probability of the data regardless of the hypothesis. A naïve Bayes algorithm may be generated by first transforming training data into a frequency table. Processor 104 may then calculate a likelihood table by calculating probabilities of different data entries and classification labels. Processor 104 may utilize a naïve Bayes equation to calculate a posterior probability for each class. A class containing the highest posterior probability is the outcome of prediction. Naïve Bayes classification algorithm may include a gaussian model that follows a normal distribution. Naïve Bayes classification algorithm may include a multinomial model that is used for discrete counts. Naïve Bayes classification algorithm may include a Bernoulli model that may be utilized when vectors are binary.

With continued reference to FIG. 1 , processor 104 may be configured to generate a classifier using a K-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm. A “K-nearest neighbors algorithm” as used in this disclosure, includes a classification method that utilizes feature similarity to analyze how closely out-of-sample-features resemble training data to classify input data to one or more clusters and/or categories of features as represented in training data; this may be performed by representing both training data and input data in vector forms, and using one or more measures of vector similarity to identify classifications within training data, and to determine a classification of input data. K-nearest neighbors algorithm may include specifying a K-value, or a number directing the classifier to select the k most similar entries training data to a given sample, determining the most common classifier of the entries in the database, and classifying the known sample; this may be performed recursively and/or iteratively to generate a classifier that may be used to classify input data as further samples. For instance, an initial set of samples may be performed to cover an initial heuristic and/or “first guess” at an output and/or relationship, which may be seeded, without limitation, using expert input received according to any process as described herein. As a non-limiting example, an initial heuristic may include a ranking of associations between inputs and elements of training data. Heuristic may include selecting some number of highest-ranking associations and/or training data elements.

With continued reference to FIG. 1 , generating k-nearest neighbors algorithm may generate a first vector output containing a data entry cluster, generating a second vector output containing an input data, and calculate the distance between the first vector output and the second vector output using any suitable norm such as cosine similarity, Euclidean distance measurement, or the like. Each vector output may be represented, without limitation, as an n-tuple of values, where n is at least two values. Each value of n-tuple of values may represent a measurement or other quantitative value associated with a given category of data, or attribute, examples of which are provided in further detail below; a vector may be represented, without limitation, in n-dimensional space using an axis per category of value represented in n-tuple of values, such that a vector has a geometric direction characterizing the relative quantities of attributes in the n-tuple as compared to each other. Two vectors may be considered equivalent where their directions, and/or the relative quantities of values within each vector as compared to each other, are the same; thus, as a non-limiting example, a vector represented as [5, 10, 15] may be treated as equivalent, for purposes of this disclosure, as a vector represented as [1, 2, 3]. Vectors may be more similar where their directions are more similar, and more different where their directions are more divergent; however, vector similarity may alternatively or additionally be determined using averages of similarities between like attributes, or any other measure of similarity suitable for any n-tuple of values, or aggregation of numerical similarity measures for the purposes of loss functions as described in further detail below. Any vectors as described herein may be scaled, such that each vector represents each attribute along an equivalent scale of values. Each vector may be “normalized,” or divided by a “length” attribute, such as a length attribute l as derived using a Pythagorean norm: l=√{square root over (Σ_(i=0) ^(n)a_(i) ²)}, where a_(i) is attribute number i of the vector. Scaling and/or normalization may function to make vector comparison independent of absolute quantities of attributes, while preserving any dependency on similarity of attributes; this may, for instance, be advantageous where cases represented in training data are represented by different quantities of samples, which may result in proportionally equivalent vectors with divergent values.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , language processing module 140 may operate to produce a language processing model. Language processing model may include a program automatically generated by processor 104 and/or language processing module to produce associations between one or more words extracted from at least a document and detect associations, including without limitation mathematical associations, between such words. Associations between language elements, where language elements include for purposes herein extracted words, relationships of such categories to other such term may include, without limitation, mathematical associations, including without limitation statistical correlations between any language element and any other language element and/or language elements. Statistical correlations and/or mathematical associations may include probabilistic formulas or relationships indicating, for instance, a likelihood that a given extracted word indicates a given category of semantic meaning. As a further example, statistical correlations and/or mathematical associations may include probabilistic formulas or relationships indicating a positive and/or negative association between at least an extracted word and/or a given semantic meaning; positive or negative indication may include an indication that a given document is or is not indicating a category semantic meaning. Whether a phrase, sentence, word, or other textual element in a document or corpus of documents constitutes a positive or negative indicator may be determined, in an embodiment, by mathematical associations between detected words, comparisons to phrases and/or words indicating positive and/or negative indicators that are stored in memory at computing device, or the like.

Still referring to 1, language processing module 104 and/or diagnostic engine may generate the language processing model by any suitable method, including without limitation a natural language processing classification algorithm; language processing model may include a natural language process classification model that enumerates and/or derives statistical relationships between input terms and output terms. Algorithm to generate language processing model may include a stochastic gradient descent algorithm, which may include a method that iteratively optimizes an objective function, such as an objective function representing a statistical estimation of relationships between terms, including relationships between input terms and output terms, in the form of a sum of relationships to be estimated. In an alternative or additional approach, sequential tokens may be modeled as chains, serving as the observations in a Hidden Markov Model (HMM). HMMs as used herein are statistical models with inference algorithms that that may be applied to the models. In such models, a hidden state to be estimated may include an association between an extracted words, phrases, and/or other semantic units. There may be a finite number of categories to which an extracted word may pertain; an HMM inference algorithm, such as the forward-backward algorithm or the Viterbi algorithm, may be used to estimate the most likely discrete state given a word or sequence of words. Language processing module may combine two or more approaches. For instance, and without limitation, machine-learning program may use a combination of Naive-Bayes (NB), Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), and parameter grid-searching classification techniques; the result may include a classification algorithm that returns ranked associations.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 1 , generating the language processing model may include generating a vector space, which may be a collection of vectors, defined as a set of mathematical objects that can be added together under an operation of addition following properties of associativity, commutativity, existence of an identity element, and existence of an inverse element for each vector, and can be multiplied by scalar values under an operation of scalar multiplication compatible with field multiplication, and that has an identity element is distributive with respect to vector addition, and is distributive with respect to field addition. Each vector in an n-dimensional vector space may be represented by an n-tuple of numerical values. Each unique extracted word and/or language element as described above may be represented by a vector of the vector space. In an embodiment, each unique extracted and/or other language element may be represented by a dimension of vector space; as a non-limiting example, each element of a vector may include a number representing an enumeration of co-occurrences of the word and/or language element represented by the vector with another word and/or language element. Vectors may be normalized, scaled according to relative frequencies of appearance and/or file sizes. In an embodiment associating language elements to one another as described above may include computing a degree of vector similarity between a vector representing each language element and a vector representing another language element; vector similarity may be measured according to any norm for proximity and/or similarity of two vectors, including without limitation cosine similarity, which measures the similarity of two vectors by evaluating the cosine of the angle between the vectors, which can be computed using a dot product of the two vectors divided by the lengths of the two vectors. Degree of similarity may include any other geometric measure of distance between vectors.

Still referring to FIG. 1 , language processing module 140 may use a corpus of documents to generate associations between language elements in a language processing module, and diagnostic engine may then use such associations to analyze words extracted from one or more documents and determine that the one or more documents indicate significance of a category. In an embodiment, language module and/or Processor 104 may perform this analysis using a selected set of significant documents, such as documents identified by one or more experts as representing good information; experts may identify or enter such documents via graphical user interface or may communicate identities of significant documents according to any other suitable method of electronic communication, or by providing such identity to other persons who may enter such identifications into processor 104. Documents may be entered into a computing device by being uploaded by an expert or other persons using, without limitation, file transfer protocol (FTP) or other suitable methods for transmission and/or upload of documents; alternatively or additionally, where a document is identified by a citation, a uniform resource identifier (URI), uniform resource locator (URL) or other datum permitting unambiguous identification of the document, diagnostic engine may automatically obtain the document using such an identifier, for instance by submitting a request to a database or compendium of documents such as JSTOR as provided by Ithaka Harbors, Inc. of New York.

Continuing to reference FIG. 1 , processor 104 is configured to generate a user metric 132, as a function of the keyword record 124, based on a plurality of weighted values reflecting desirability. A “user metric” is a quantifiable number used to define a user. In an embodiment, the keywords in the keyword record 124 may be assigned a weight or a score. The sum of the weights/scored of the keyword record may be used to show desirability of a candidate. A higher weight/number may represent more desirability. “Desirability”, as used herein, is the quality of a job candidate and measures the job candidate's match to a job posting. The weights for the keywords may be assigned by a job offerer or be assigned by processor 104 through the use of a machine-learning module 144. For example, a job offerer may rank keywords such as “managerial positions” with a higher number such as 4 than keywords such as “entry level positions”, which may be weighted as a 2. Additionally, job awards/achievements may be ranked with a 3. A user may also assign a negative factor to keywords within the keyword record such as “fired” with a negative score. The processor 104 is configured to identify at least a negative factor in the keyword record. As a result of the negative factor, the plurality of weighted values is adjusted as a function of the negative factor. In an embodiment, being fired may result in a −2 weight. In the instance that a user 112 may have 2 managerial positions, 2 entry level positions, 1 recognition award, and 1 instance of being fired, the user 112 may score a 13 as their user metric 132. As used herein, a “negative factor” are aspects of a user's historical record that are lacking. For example, and without limitation, a negative factor may include being fired, being reprimanded, having a negative review from a previous employer, or the like. The plurality of weighted values may also be adjusted by positive factors. As used herein, a “positive factor” are aspects of a user's historical record that are good for hiring. For example, positive factors may include having managerial experience, time in the work force, wherein more time results in a higher weight, recognitions, awards, or the like. Processor 104 may be configured to identify at least a positive factor in the keyword record. As a result of the positive factor, the plurality of weighted values is adjusted as a function of the negative factor. For example, a weighted value may be increases as a result of the positive factor. A posting 120, such as a job posting, may require a minimum user metric to be considered for a job. In an embodiment, a posting 120 may require a 15 as the user metric 132 to be considered for a job. In this case, user 112 may not qualify for the posting 120. A user metric 132 may be stored on an immutable sequential listing. A user metric 132 may be associated with the user-associated data set 108 that may also be stored on an immutable sequential listing.

Continuing to reference FIG. 1 , a machine-learning module 144 may be used to generate a user metric 132. Similar to the keyword classifier 136 used above, machine-learning module may use a metric classifier 148 to determine a user metric 132. Metric classifier 148 may use training data such as previously scored keyword records to determine a user metric 132. Classifier may take data collected from a user on weights for various keywords, previously scored keyword records, or the like as algorithm inputs and output data relating to the scoring of the current keyword record 124. Classification may be any classification as discussed in this disclosure.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 1 , processor 104 is configured to receive an identification of a posting of a plurality of postings. A plurality of postings may be compiled from one or more job boards and/or job aggregator websites. Postings may include any generic job listing or a specific job listing designated for a job seeker. The plurality of postings may be stored in a posting database. A “posting database”, as used herein, is a storage of a plurality of postings. Databases are discussed in further detail below. Job seeker, through the processor 104, may choose to apply to a posting 120 of a plurality of postings based on user metric 132. As a result of the selection of a posting 120 by the job seeker, processor 104 may receive an identification of the posting 120. Apparatus 100 and/or processor 104 may be configured to select a posting 120. In some embodiments, the selection of a posting 120 by processor 104 and/or apparatus 100 may be considered to be receiving an identification of a posting of the plurality of postings. Processor 104 may select postings based on one or more skills, education levels, and/or traits contained within a job seeker's user-associated data set 108 and/or keyword record 124 or based on the user metric 132. Relevant information may be extracted using methods discussed above such as OCR or language processing module 140 or querying processes. User metric 132 may be compared to the user metric required by the posting 120. If user metric 132 is greater than or equal to the user metric required by the posting 120, posting 120 may be displayed and/or selected by the user 112. Additionally, processor 104 may use a master list to make an index that may be used to search keywords. Master list may be used to determine a plurality of postings to browse. As used in this disclosure, a “master list” is a collection of locations of a plurality of postings. As discussed above, a plurality of postings may be located on an immutable sequential listing. A plurality of job listings may also be in a local database or a multi-nodal secure database. A master list may include a hash-table and/or distributed hash table which may be used to locate a posting entry. For example, a public key associated with a keyword containing location information pertaining to a posting entry with the keyword may be converted into a series of hash functions. This may occur by converting an entry into a series of integers by using a hash function. A hash function may include any function that may be used to map a set of data which falls into the hash table. Hash functions may be stored in a hash table, where it can be quickly retrieved using a hashed key. The hashed key may then be used to access posting entry when prompted. Using the hashed key, a hash function may compute an index that may suggest where posting entry may be found. Additionally or alternatively, master list may include a tree structure such as a Merkle tree. Processor may traverse such tree structure by matching keywords to the different tiers of the tree, thus narrowing the list of plurality of postings.

Continuing to reference FIG. 1 , databases such as posting database 152 and resource data storage system 116 may be implemented, without limitation, as a relational database, a key-value retrieval database such as a NOSQL database, or any other format or structure for use as a database that a person skilled in the art would recognize as suitable upon review of the entirety of this disclosure. Database may alternatively or additionally be implemented using a distributed data storage protocol and/or data structure, such as a distributed hash table or the like. Database may include a plurality of data entries and/or records as described above. Data entries in a database may be flagged with or linked to one or more additional elements of information, which may be reflected in data entry cells and/or in linked tables such as tables related by one or more indices in a relational database. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various ways in which data entries in a database may store, retrieve, organize, and/or reflect data and/or records as used herein, as well as categories and/or populations of data consistently with this disclosure.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 1 , apparatus 100 is configured to match a posting 120 of a plurality of postings to a user 112 as a function of the user metric 132. Matching a posting 120 to a user 112 may include classifying a user 112 to a posting 120 or vise versa. Classifying the user 112 may include a classification algorithm to output matches between the user metric 132 and/or keyword record 124 and a posting 120 of the plurality of postings. A “classifier,” as used in this disclosure is a machine-learning model, such as a mathematical model, neural net, or program generated by a machine learning algorithm known as a “classification algorithm,” as described in further detail below, that sorts of inputs into categories or bins of data, outputting the categories or bins of data and/or labels associated therewith. A classifier may be configured to output at least a datum that labels or otherwise identifies a set of data that are clustered together, found to be close under a distance metric as described below, or the like. Processor 104 may generate classifier using a classification algorithm, defined as a process whereby processor 104 derives classifier from training data. Classification may be performed using, without limitation, linear classifiers such as without limitation logistic regression and/or naive Bayes classifiers, nearest neighbor classifiers such as k-nearest neighbors classifiers, support vector machines, least squares support vector machines, fisher's linear discriminant, quadratic classifiers, decision trees, boosted trees, random forest classifiers, learning vector quantization, and/or neural network-based classifiers. In some embodiments, classifier may take the data collected from posting 120 and keyword record 124 as algorithm inputs, wherein the training data includes a video/posting database, queried video resumes, and output data from a language processing module, to match a user 112 to a posting 120. For example keyword record 124 with a keyword related to nursing, once queried, and may be put through the classifier to be matched to a posting 120 related to medical/nursing jobs. Additionally or alternatively, classifier may take the user metric 132 and match it to postings looking for a similar user metric. For example, a user 112 with a user metric 132 of 15 and a keyword record 124 with a keyword relating to nursing may be matched to a posting 120 relating to a medical/nursing job looking for a user with a user metric 132 of 10 or more.

Referring now to FIG. 2 , an exemplary embodiment of an immutable sequential listing 116 is illustrated. Data elements are listing in immutable sequential listing 116; data elements may include any form of data, including textual data, image data, encrypted data, cryptographically hashed data, and the like. Data elements may include, without limitation, one or more at least a digitally signed assertions. In one embodiment, a digitally signed assertion 204 is a collection of textual data signed using a secure proof as described in further detail below; secure proof may include, without limitation, a digital signature as described above. Collection of textual data may contain any textual data, including without limitation American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII), Unicode, or similar computer-encoded textual data, any alphanumeric data, punctuation, diacritical mark, or any character or other marking used in any writing system to convey information, in any form, including any plaintext or cyphertext data; in an embodiment, collection of textual data may be encrypted, or may be a hash of other data, such as a root or node of a Merkle tree or hash tree, or a hash of any other information desired to be recorded in some fashion using a digitally signed assertion 204. In an embodiment, collection of textual data states that the owner of a certain transferable item represented in a digitally signed assertion 204 register is transferring that item to the owner of an address. A digitally signed assertion 204 may be signed by a digital signature created using the private key associated with the owner's public key, as described above.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , a digitally signed assertion 204 may describe a transfer of virtual currency, such as crypto-currency as described below. The virtual currency may be a digital currency. Item of value may be a transfer of trust, for instance represented by a statement vouching for the identity or trustworthiness of the first entity. Item of value may be an interest in a fungible negotiable financial instrument representing ownership in a public or private corporation, a creditor relationship with a governmental body or a corporation, rights to ownership represented by an option, derivative financial instrument, commodity, debt-backed security such as a bond or debenture or other security as described in further detail below. A resource may be a physical machine e.g. a ride share vehicle or any other asset. A digitally signed assertion 204 may describe the transfer of a physical good; for instance, a digitally signed assertion 204 may describe the sale of a product. In some embodiments, a transfer nominally of one item may be used to represent a transfer of another item; for instance, a transfer of virtual currency may be interpreted as representing a transfer of an access right; conversely, where the item nominally transferred is something other than virtual currency, the transfer itself may still be treated as a transfer of virtual currency, having value that depends on many potential factors including the value of the item nominally transferred and the monetary value attendant to having the output of the transfer moved into a particular user's control. The item of value may be associated with a digitally signed assertion 204 by means of an exterior protocol, such as the COLORED COINS created according to protocols developed by The Colored Coins Foundation, the MASTERCOIN protocol developed by the Mastercoin Foundation, or the ETHEREUM platform offered by the Stiftung Ethereum Foundation of Baar, Switzerland, the Thunder protocol developed by Thunder Consensus, or any other protocol.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , in one embodiment, an address is a textual datum identifying the recipient of virtual currency or another item of value in a digitally signed assertion 204. In some embodiments, address is linked to a public key, the corresponding private key of which is owned by the recipient of a digitally signed assertion 204. For instance, address may be the public key. Address may be a representation, such as a hash, of the public key. Address may be linked to the public key in memory of a processor 104, for instance via a “wallet shortener” protocol. Where address is linked to a public key, a transferee in a digitally signed assertion 204 may record a subsequent a digitally signed assertion 204 transferring some or all of the value transferred in the first a digitally signed assertion 204 to a new address in the same manner. A digitally signed assertion 204 may contain textual information that is not a transfer of some item of value in addition to, or as an alternative to, such a transfer. For instance, as described in further detail below, a digitally signed assertion 204 may indicate a confidence level associated with a distributed storage node as described in further detail below.

In an embodiment, and still referring to FIG. 2 immutable sequential listing 116 records a series of at least a posted content in a way that preserves the order in which the at least a posted content took place. Temporally sequential listing may be accessible at any of various security settings; for instance, and without limitation, temporally sequential listing may be readable and modifiable publicly, may be publicly readable but writable only by entities and/or devices having access privileges established by password protection, confidence level, or any device authentication procedure or facilities described herein, or may be readable and/or writable only by entities and/or devices having such access privileges. Access privileges may exist in more than one level, including, without limitation, a first access level or community of permitted entities and/or devices having ability to read, and a second access level or community of permitted entities and/or devices having ability to write; first and second community may be overlapping or non-overlapping. In an embodiment, posted content and/or immutable sequential listing 116 may be stored as one or more zero knowledge sets (ZKS), Private Information Retrieval (PIR) structure, or any other structure that allows checking of membership in a set by querying with specific properties. Such database may incorporate protective measures to ensure that malicious actors may not query the database repeatedly in an effort to narrow the members of a set to reveal uniquely identifying information of a given posted content.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , immutable sequential listing 116 may preserve the order in which the at least a posted content took place by listing them in chronological order; alternatively or additionally, immutable sequential listing 116 may organize digitally signed assertions 204 into sub-listings 208 such as “blocks” in a blockchain, which may be themselves collected in a temporally sequential order; digitally signed assertions 204 within a sub-listing 208 may or may not be temporally sequential. The ledger may preserve the order in which at least a posted content took place by listing them in sub-listings 208 and placing the sub-listings 208 in chronological order. The immutable sequential listing 116 may be a distributed, consensus-based ledger, such as those operated according to the protocols promulgated by Ripple Labs, Inc., of San Francisco, Calif., or the Stellar Development Foundation, of San Francisco, Calif., or of Thunder Consensus. In some embodiments, the ledger is a secured ledger; in one embodiment, a secured ledger is a ledger having safeguards against alteration by unauthorized parties. The ledger may be maintained by a proprietor, such as a system administrator on a server, that controls access to the ledger; for instance, the user account controls may allow contributors to the ledger to add at least a posted content to the ledger, but may not allow any users to alter at least a posted content that have been added to the ledger. In some embodiments, ledger is cryptographically secured; in one embodiment, a ledger is cryptographically secured where each link in the chain contains encrypted or hashed information that makes it practically infeasible to alter the ledger without betraying that alteration has taken place, for instance by requiring that an administrator or other party sign new additions to the chain with a digital signature. Immutable sequential listing 116 may be incorporated in, stored in, or incorporate, any suitable data structure, including without limitation any database, datastore, file structure, distributed hash table, directed acyclic graph or the like. In some embodiments, the timestamp of an entry is cryptographically secured and validated via trusted time, either directly on the chain or indirectly by utilizing a separate chain. In one embodiment the validity of timestamp is provided using a time stamping authority as described in the RFC 3161 standard for trusted timestamps, or in the ANSI ASC x9.95 standard. In another embodiment, the trusted time ordering is provided by a group of entities collectively acting as the time stamping authority with a requirement that a threshold number of the group of authorities sign the timestamp.

In some embodiments, and with continued reference to FIG. 2 , immutable sequential listing 116, once formed, may be inalterable by any party, no matter what access rights that party possesses. For instance, immutable sequential listing 116 may include a hash chain, in which data is added during a successive hashing process to ensure non-repudiation. Immutable sequential listing 116 may include a block chain. In one embodiment, a block chain is immutable sequential listing 116 that records one or more new at least a posted content in a data item known as a sub-listing 208 or “block.” An example of a block chain is the BITCOIN block chain used to record BITCOIN transactions and values. Sub-listings 208 may be created in a way that places the sub-listings 208 in chronological order and link each sub-listing 208 to a previous sub-listing 208 in the chronological order so that any processor 104 may traverse the sub-listings 208 in reverse chronological order to verify any at least a posted content listed in the block chain. Each new sub-listing 208 may be required to contain a cryptographic hash describing the previous sub-listing 208. In some embodiments, the block chain contains a single first sub-listing 208 sometimes known as a “genesis block.”

Still referring to FIG. 2 , the creation of a new sub-listing 208 may be computationally expensive; for instance, the creation of a new sub-listing 208 may be designed by a “proof of work” protocol accepted by all participants in forming the immutable sequential listing 116 to take a powerful set of computing devices a certain period of time to produce. Where one sub-listing 208 takes less time for a given set of computing devices to produce the sub-listing 208 protocol may adjust the algorithm to produce the next sub-listing 208 so that it will require more steps; where one sub-listing 208 takes more time for a given set of computing devices to produce the sub-listing 208 protocol may adjust the algorithm to produce the next sub-listing 208 so that it will require fewer steps. As an example, protocol may require a new sub-listing 208 to contain a cryptographic hash describing its contents; the cryptographic hash may be required to satisfy a mathematical condition, achieved by having the sub-listing 208 contain a number, called a nonce, whose value is determined after the fact by the discovery of the hash that satisfies the mathematical condition. Continuing the example, the protocol may be able to adjust the mathematical condition so that the discovery of the hash describing a sub-listing 208 and satisfying the mathematical condition requires more or less steps, depending on the outcome of the previous hashing attempt. Mathematical condition, as an example, might be that the hash contains a certain number of leading zeros and a hashing algorithm that requires more steps to find a hash containing a greater number of leading zeros, and fewer steps to find a hash containing a lesser number of leading zeros. In some embodiments, production of a new sub-listing 208 according to the protocol is known as “mining.” The creation of a new sub-listing 208 may be designed by a “proof of stake” protocol as will be apparent to those skilled in the art upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 2 , in some embodiments, protocol also creates an incentive to mine new sub-listings 208. The incentive may be financial; for instance, successfully mining a new sub-listing 208 may result in the person or entity that mines the sub-listing 208 receiving a predetermined amount of currency. The currency may be fiat currency. Currency may be cryptocurrency as defined below. In other embodiments, incentive may be redeemed for particular products or services; the incentive may be a gift certificate with a particular business, for instance. In some embodiments, incentive is sufficiently attractive to cause participants to compete for the incentive by trying to race each other to the creation of sub-listings 208 Each sub-listing 208 created in immutable sequential listing 116 may contain a record or at least a posted content describing one or more addresses that receive an incentive, such as virtual currency, as the result of successfully mining the sub-listing 208.

With continued reference to FIG. 2 , where two entities simultaneously create new sub-listings 208, immutable sequential listing 116 may develop a fork; protocol may determine which of the two alternate branches in the fork is the valid new portion of the immutable sequential listing 116 by evaluating, after a certain amount of time has passed, which branch is longer. “Length” may be measured according to the number of sub-listings 208 in the branch. Length may be measured according to the total computational cost of producing the branch. Protocol may treat only at least a posted content contained the valid branch as valid at least a posted content. When a branch is found invalid according to this protocol, at least a posted content registered in that branch may be recreated in a new sub-listing 208 in the valid branch; the protocol may reject “double spending” at least a posted content that transfer the same virtual currency that another at least a posted content in the valid branch has already transferred. As a result, in some embodiments the creation of fraudulent at least a posted content requires the creation of a longer immutable sequential listing 116 branch by the entity attempting the fraudulent at least a posted content than the branch being produced by the rest of the participants; as long as the entity creating the fraudulent at least a posted content is likely the only one with the incentive to create the branch containing the fraudulent at least a posted content, the computational cost of the creation of that branch may be practically infeasible, guaranteeing the validity of all at least a posted content in the immutable sequential listing 116.

Still referring to FIG. 2 , additional data linked to at least a posted content may be incorporated in sub-listings 208 in the immutable sequential listing 116; for instance, data may be incorporated in one or more fields recognized by block chain protocols that permit a person or computer forming a at least a posted content to insert additional data in the immutable sequential listing 116. In some embodiments, additional data is incorporated in an unspendable at least a posted content field. For instance, the data may be incorporated in an OP RETURN within the BITCOIN block chain. In other embodiments, additional data is incorporated in one signature of a multi-signature at least a posted content. In an embodiment, a multi-signature at least a posted content is at least a posted content to two or more addresses. In some embodiments, the two or more addresses are hashed together to form a single address, which is signed in the digital signature of the at least a posted content. In other embodiments, the two or more addresses are concatenated. In some embodiments, two or more addresses may be combined by a more complicated process, such as the creation of a Merkle tree or the like. In some embodiments, one or more addresses incorporated in the multi-signature at least a posted content are typical crypto-currency addresses, such as addresses linked to public keys as described above, while one or more additional addresses in the multi-signature at least a posted content contain additional data related to the at least a posted content; for instance, the additional data may indicate the purpose of the at least a posted content, aside from an exchange of virtual currency, such as the item for which the virtual currency was exchanged. In some embodiments, additional information may include network statistics for a given node of network, such as a distributed storage node, e.g. the latencies to nearest neighbors in a network graph, the identities or identifying information of neighboring nodes in the network graph, the trust level and/or mechanisms of trust (e.g. certificates of physical encryption keys, certificates of software encryption keys, (in non-limiting example certificates of software encryption may indicate the firmware version, manufacturer, hardware version and the like), certificates from a trusted third party, certificates from a decentralized anonymous authentication procedure, and other information quantifying the trusted status of the distributed storage node) of neighboring nodes in the network graph, IP addresses, GPS coordinates, and other information informing location of the node and/or neighboring nodes, geographically and/or within the network graph. In some embodiments, additional information may include history and/or statistics of neighboring nodes with which the node has interacted. In some embodiments, this additional information may be encoded directly, via a hash, hash tree or other encoding.

With continued reference to FIG. 2 , in some embodiments, virtual currency is traded as a crypto-currency. In one embodiment, a crypto-currency is a digital, currency such as Bitcoins, Peercoins, Namecoins, and Litecoins. Crypto-currency may be a clone of another crypto-currency. The crypto-currency may be an “alt-coin.” Crypto-currency may be decentralized, with no particular entity controlling it; the integrity of the crypto-currency may be maintained by adherence by its participants to established protocols for exchange and for production of new currency, which may be enforced by software implementing the crypto-currency. Crypto-currency may be centralized, with its protocols enforced or hosted by a particular entity. For instance, crypto-currency may be maintained in a centralized ledger, as in the case of the XRP currency of Ripple Labs, Inc., of San Francisco, Calif. In lieu of a centrally controlling authority, such as a national bank, to manage currency values, the number of units of a particular crypto-currency may be limited; the rate at which units of crypto-currency enter the market may be managed by a mutually agreed-upon process, such as creating new units of currency when mathematical puzzles are solved, the degree of difficulty of the puzzles being adjustable to control the rate at which new units enter the market. Mathematical puzzles may be the same as the algorithms used to make productions of sub-listings 208 in a block chain computationally challenging; the incentive for producing sub-listings 208 may include the grant of new crypto-currency to the miners. Quantities of crypto-currency may be exchanged using at least a posted content as described above.

Referring now to FIG. 3 , an exemplary embodiment of a machine-learning module 144 that may perform one or more machine-learning processes as described in this disclosure is illustrated. Machine-learning module may perform determinations, classification, and/or analysis steps, methods, processes, or the like as described in this disclosure using machine learning processes. A “machine learning process,” as used in this disclosure, is a process that automatedly uses training data 304 to generate an algorithm that will be performed by a processor 104/module to produce outputs 308 given data provided as inputs 312; this is in contrast to a non-machine learning software program where the commands to be executed are determined in advance by a user and written in a programming language.

Still referring to FIG. 3 , “training data,” as used herein, is data containing correlations that a machine-learning process may use to model relationships between two or more categories of data elements. For instance, and without limitation, training data 304 may include a plurality of data entries, each entry representing a set of data elements that were recorded, received, and/or generated together; data elements may be correlated by shared existence in a given data entry, by proximity in a given data entry, or the like. Multiple data entries in training data 304 may evince one or more trends in correlations between categories of data elements; for instance, and without limitation, a higher value of a first data element belonging to a first category of data element may tend to correlate to a higher value of a second data element belonging to a second category of data element, indicating a possible proportional or other mathematical relationship linking values belonging to the two categories. Multiple categories of data elements may be related in training data 304 according to various correlations; correlations may indicate causative and/or predictive links between categories of data elements, which may be modeled as relationships such as mathematical relationships by machine-learning processes as described in further detail below. Training data 304 may be formatted and/or organized by categories of data elements, for instance by associating data elements with one or more descriptors corresponding to categories of data elements. As a non-limiting example, training data 304 may include data entered in standardized forms by persons or processes, such that entry of a given data element in a given field in a form may be mapped to one or more descriptors of categories. Elements in training data 304 may be linked to descriptors of categories by tags, tokens, or other data elements; for instance, and without limitation, training data 304 may be provided in fixed-length formats, formats linking positions of data to categories such as comma-separated value (CSV) formats and/or self-describing formats such as extensible markup language (XML), JavaScript Object Notation (JSON), or the like, enabling processes or devices to detect categories of data.

Alternatively or additionally, and continuing to refer to FIG. 3 , training data 304 may include one or more elements that are not categorized; that is, training data 304 may not be formatted or contain descriptors for some elements of data. Machine-learning algorithms and/or other processes may sort training data 304 according to one or more categorizations using, for instance, natural language processing algorithms, tokenization, detection of correlated values in raw data and the like; categories may be generated using correlation and/or other processing algorithms. As a non-limiting example, in a corpus of text, phrases making up a number “n” of compound words, such as nouns modified by other nouns, may be identified according to a statistically significant prevalence of n-grams containing such words in a particular order; such an n-gram may be categorized as an element of language such as a “word” to be tracked similarly to single words, generating a new category as a result of statistical analysis. Similarly, in a data entry including some textual data, a person's name may be identified by reference to a list, dictionary, or other compendium of terms, permitting ad-hoc categorization by machine-learning algorithms, and/or automated association of data in the data entry with descriptors or into a given format. The ability to categorize data entries automatedly may enable the same training data 304 to be made applicable for two or more distinct machine-learning algorithms as described in further detail below. Training data 304 used by machine-learning module 144 may correlate any input data as described in this disclosure to any output data as described in this disclosure. As a non-limiting illustrative inputs may include subject-specific data and outputs may include description-specific data.

Further referring to FIG. 3 , training data may be filtered, sorted, and/or selected using one or more supervised and/or unsupervised machine-learning processes and/or models as described in further detail below; such models may include without limitation a training data classifier 316. Training data classifier 316 may include a “classifier,” which as used in this disclosure is a machine-learning model as defined below, such as a mathematical model, neural net, or program generated by a machine learning algorithm known as a “classification algorithm,” as described in further detail below, that sorts inputs into categories or bins of data, outputting the categories or bins of data and/or labels associated therewith. A classifier may be configured to output at least a datum that labels or otherwise identifies a set of data that are clustered together, found to be close under a distance metric as described below, or the like. Machine-learning module 144 may generate a classifier using a classification algorithm, defined as a processes whereby a processor 104 and/or any module and/or component operating thereon derives a classifier from training data 304. Classification may be performed using, without limitation, linear classifiers such as without limitation logistic regression and/or naive Bayes classifiers, nearest neighbor classifiers such as k-nearest neighbors classifiers, support vector machines, least squares support vector machines, fisher's linear discriminant, quadratic classifiers, decision trees, boosted trees, random forest classifiers, learning vector quantization, and/or neural network-based classifiers. As a non-limiting example, training data classifier 316 may classify elements of training data to according to fields of job description for instance, title, role, organization, requisite experience, requisite credentials, and the like.

Still referring to FIG. 3 , machine-learning module 144 may be configured to perform a lazy-learning process 320 and/or protocol, which may alternatively be referred to as a “lazy loading” or “call-when-needed” process and/or protocol, may be a process whereby machine learning is conducted upon receipt of an input to be converted to an output, by combining the input and training set to derive the algorithm to be used to produce the output on demand. For instance, an initial set of simulations may be performed to cover an initial heuristic and/or “first guess” at an output and/or relationship. As a non-limiting example, an initial heuristic may include a ranking of associations between inputs and elements of training data 304. Heuristic may include selecting some number of highest-ranking associations and/or training data 304 elements. Lazy learning may implement any suitable lazy learning algorithm, including without limitation a K-nearest neighbors algorithm, a lazy naïve Bayes algorithm, or the like; persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various lazy-learning algorithms that may be applied to generate outputs as described in this disclosure, including without limitation lazy learning applications of machine-learning algorithms as described in further detail below.

Alternatively or additionally, and with continued reference to FIG. 3 , machine-learning processes as described in this disclosure may be used to generate machine-learning models 324. A “machine-learning model,” as used in this disclosure, is a mathematical and/or algorithmic representation of a relationship between inputs and outputs, as generated using any machine-learning process including without limitation any process as described above and stored in memory; an input is submitted to a machine-learning model 324 once created, which generates an output based on the relationship that was derived. For instance, and without limitation, a linear regression model, generated using a linear regression algorithm, may compute a linear combination of input data using coefficients derived during machine-learning processes to calculate an output datum. As a further non-limiting example, a machine-learning model 324 may be generated by creating an artificial neural network, such as a convolutional neural network comprising an input layer of nodes, one or more intermediate layers, and an output layer of nodes. Connections between nodes may be created via the process of “training” the network, in which elements from a training data 304 set are applied to the input nodes, a suitable training algorithm (such as Levenberg-Marquardt, conjugate gradient, simulated annealing, or other algorithms) is then used to adjust the connections and weights between nodes in adjacent layers of the neural network to produce the desired values at the output nodes. This process is sometimes referred to as deep learning.

Still referring to FIG. 3 , machine-learning algorithms may include at least a supervised machine-learning process 328. At least a supervised machine-learning process 328, as defined herein, include algorithms that receive a training set relating a number of inputs to a number of outputs, and seek to find one or more mathematical relations relating inputs to outputs, where each of the one or more mathematical relations is optimal according to some criterion specified to the algorithm using some scoring function. For instance, a supervised learning algorithm may include subject-specific data as described above as inputs, description-specific data as outputs, and a scoring function representing a desired form of relationship to be detected between inputs and outputs; scoring function may, for instance, seek to maximize the probability that a given input and/or combination of elements inputs is associated with a given output to minimize the probability that a given input is not associated with a given output. Scoring function may be expressed as a risk function representing an “expected loss” of an algorithm relating inputs to outputs, where loss is computed as an error function representing a degree to which a prediction generated by the relation is incorrect when compared to a given input-output pair provided in training data 304. Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various possible variations of at least a supervised machine-learning process 328 that may be used to determine relation between inputs and outputs. Supervised machine-learning processes may include classification algorithms as defined above.

Further referring to FIG. 3 , machine learning processes may include at least an unsupervised machine-learning processes 332. An unsupervised machine-learning process, as used herein, is a process that derives inferences in datasets without regard to labels; as a result, an unsupervised machine-learning process may be free to discover any structure, relationship, and/or correlation provided in the data. Unsupervised processes may not require a response variable; unsupervised processes may be used to find interesting patterns and/or inferences between variables, to determine a degree of correlation between two or more variables, or the like.

Still referring to FIG. 3 , machine-learning module 144 may be designed and configured to create a machine-learning model 324 using techniques for development of linear regression models. Linear regression models may include ordinary least squares regression, which aims to minimize the square of the difference between predicted outcomes and actual outcomes according to an appropriate norm for measuring such a difference (e.g. a vector-space distance norm); coefficients of the resulting linear equation may be modified to improve minimization. Linear regression models may include ridge regression methods, where the function to be minimized includes the least-squares function plus term multiplying the square of each coefficient by a scalar amount to penalize large coefficients. Linear regression models may include least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) models, in which ridge regression is combined with multiplying the least-squares term by a factor of 1 divided by double the number of samples. Linear regression models may include a multi-task lasso model wherein the norm applied in the least-squares term of the lasso model is the Frobenius norm amounting to the square root of the sum of squares of all terms. Linear regression models may include the elastic net model, a multi-task elastic net model, a least angle regression model, a LARS lasso model, an orthogonal matching pursuit model, a Bayesian regression model, a logistic regression model, a stochastic gradient descent model, a perceptron model, a passive aggressive algorithm, a robustness regression model, a Huber regression model, or any other suitable model that may occur to persons skilled in the art upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure. Linear regression models may be generalized in an embodiment to polynomial regression models, whereby a polynomial equation (e.g. a quadratic, cubic or higher-order equation) providing a best predicted output/actual output fit is sought; similar methods to those described above may be applied to minimize error functions, as will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 3 , machine-learning algorithms may include, without limitation, linear discriminant analysis. Machine-learning algorithm may include quadratic discriminate analysis. Machine-learning algorithms may include kernel ridge regression. Machine-learning algorithms may include support vector machines, including without limitation support vector classification-based regression processes. Machine-learning algorithms may include stochastic gradient descent algorithms, including classification and regression algorithms based on stochastic gradient descent. Machine-learning algorithms may include nearest neighbors algorithms. Machine-learning algorithms may include various forms of latent space regularization such as variational regularization. Machine-learning algorithms may include Gaussian processes such as Gaussian Process Regression. Machine-learning algorithms may include cross-decomposition algorithms, including partial least squares and/or canonical correlation analysis. Machine-learning algorithms may include naïve Bayes methods. Machine-learning algorithms may include algorithms based on decision trees, such as decision tree classification or regression algorithms. Machine-learning algorithms may include ensemble methods such as bagging meta-estimator, forest of randomized tress, AdaBoost, gradient tree boosting, and/or voting classifier methods. Machine-learning algorithms may include neural net algorithms, including convolutional neural net processes.

Referring now to FIG. 4 , an exemplary embodiment of neural network 400 is illustrated. A neural network 400 also known as an artificial neural network, is a network of “nodes,” or data structures having one or more inputs, one or more outputs, and a function determining outputs based on inputs. Such nodes may be organized in a network, such as without limitation a convolutional neural network, including an input layer of nodes, one or more intermediate layers, and an output layer of nodes. Connections between nodes may be created via the process of “training” the network, in which elements from a training dataset are applied to the input nodes, a suitable training algorithm (such as Levenberg-Marquardt, conjugate gradient, simulated annealing, or other algorithms) is then used to adjust the connections and weights between nodes in adjacent layers of the neural network to produce the desired values at the output nodes. This process is sometimes referred to as deep learning. Connections may run solely from input nodes toward output nodes in a “feed-forward” network or may feed outputs of one layer back to inputs of the same or a different layer in a “recurrent network.”

Referring now to FIG. 5 , an exemplary embodiment of a node 500 of a neural network is illustrated. A node 500 may include, without limitation a plurality of inputs x_(i) that may receive numerical values from inputs to a neural network containing the node and/or from other nodes. Node may perform a weighted sum of inputs using weights w_(i) that are multiplied by respective inputs x_(i). Additionally or alternatively, a bias b may be added to the weighted sum of the inputs such that an offset is added to each unit in the neural network layer that is independent of the input to the layer. The weighted sum may then be input into a function φ, which may generate one or more outputs y. Weight w_(i) applied to an input x_(i) may indicate whether the input is “excitatory,” indicating that it has strong influence on the one or more outputs y, for instance by the corresponding weight having a large numerical value, and/or a “inhibitory,” indicating it has a weak effect influence on the one more inputs y, for instance by the corresponding weight having a small numerical value. The values of weights w_(i) may be determined by training a neural network using training data, which may be performed using any suitable process as described above.

-   -   Referring to FIG. 6 , an exemplary embodiment of fuzzy set         comparison 600 is illustrated. A first fuzzy set 604 may be         represented, without limitation, according to a first membership         function 608 representing a probability that an input falling on         a first range of values 612 is a member of the first fuzzy set         604, where the first membership function 608 has values on a         range of probabilities such as without limitation the interval         [0,1], and an area beneath the first membership function 608 may         represent a set of values within first fuzzy set 604. Although         first range of values 612 is illustrated for clarity in this         exemplary depiction as a range on a single number line or axis,         first range of values 612 may be defined on two or more         dimensions, representing, for instance, a Cartesian product         between a plurality of ranges, curves, axes, spaces, dimensions,         or the like. First membership function 608 may include any         suitable function mapping first range 612 to a probability         interval, including without limitation a triangular function         defined by two linear elements such as line segments or planes         that intersect at or below the top of the probability interval.         As a non-limiting example, triangular membership function may be         defined as:

${y\left( {x,a,b,c} \right)} = \left\{ \begin{matrix} {0,{{{for}x} > {c{and}x} < a}} \\ {\frac{x - a}{b - a},{{{for}a} \leq x < b}} \\ {\frac{c - x}{c - b},{{{if}b} < x \leq c}} \end{matrix} \right.$

a trapezoidal membership function may be defined as:

${y\left( {x,a,b,c,d} \right)} = {\max\left( {{\min\ \left( {\frac{x - a}{b - a},1,\frac{d - x}{d - c}} \right)},0} \right)}$

a sigmoidal function may be defined as:

${y\left( {x,a,c} \right)} = \frac{1}{1 - e^{- {a({x - c})}}}$

a Gaussian membership function may be defined as:

${y\left( {x,c,\sigma} \right)} = e^{{- \frac{1}{2}}{(\frac{x - c}{\sigma})}^{2}}$

and a bell membership function may be defined as:

$\left. {{{y\left( {x,a,b,c,} \right)} = \left\lbrack {1 +} \middle| \frac{x - c}{a} \right.}❘}^{2b} \right\rbrack^{- 1}$

Persons skilled in the art, upon reviewing the entirety of this disclosure, will be aware of various alternative or additional membership functions that may be used consistently with this disclosure.

Still referring to FIG. 6 , first fuzzy set 604 may represent any value or combination of values as described above, including output from one or more processes (e.g., machine-learning models), subject-specific data (e.g., keywords 136 and/or features 148), and description-specific data. A second fuzzy set 616, which may represent any value which may be represented by first fuzzy set 604, may be defined by a second membership function 620 on a second range 624; second range 624 may be identical and/or overlap with first range 612 and/or may be combined with first range via Cartesian product or the like to generate a mapping permitting evaluation overlap of first fuzzy set 604 and second fuzzy set 616. Where first fuzzy set 604 and second fuzzy set 616 have a region 628 that overlaps, first membership function 608 and second membership function 620 may intersect at a point 632 representing a probability, as defined on probability interval, of a match between first fuzzy set 604 and second fuzzy set 616. Alternatively or additionally, a single value of first and/or second fuzzy set may be located at a locus 636 on first range 612 and/or second range 624, where a probability of membership may be taken by evaluation of first membership function 608 and/or second membership function 620 at that range point. A probability at 628 and/or 632 may be compared to a threshold 640 to determine whether a positive match is indicated. Threshold 640 may, in a non-limiting example, represent a degree of match between first fuzzy set 604 and second fuzzy set 616, and/or single values therein with each other or with either set, which is sufficient for purposes of the matching process; for instance, threshold may indicate a sufficient degree of overlap between an output from one or more machine-learning models and/or subject-specific data and a predetermined class, such as without limitation a job description, for combination to occur as described above. Alternatively or additionally, each threshold may be tuned by a machine-learning and/or statistical process, for instance and without limitation as described in further detail below.

Further referring to FIG. 6 , in an embodiment, a degree of match between fuzzy sets may be used to classify a user-associated data set 108 with a keyword. For instance, user-associated data set 108 has a fuzzy set matching a keyword by having a degree of overlap exceeding a threshold, processor 104 may classify the keyword with the set of data to make a keyword record 124. Where multiple fuzzy matches are performed, degrees of match for each respective fuzzy set may be computed and aggregated through, for instance, addition, averaging, or the like, to determine an overall degree of match.

Still referring to FIG. 6 , in an embodiment, user-specific data set may be compared to multiple class fuzzy sets representing job postings. For instance, user-specific data set may be represented by an individual fuzzy set that is compared to each of the multiple class fuzzy sets; and a degree of overlap exceeding a threshold between the individual fuzzy set and any of the multiple class fuzzy sets may cause processor 104 to classify the user as belonging to a posting entry. For instance, in one embodiment there may be two class fuzzy sets, representing a first posting entry and a second posting entry. First posting entry may have a first fuzzy set; second posting entry may have a second fuzzy set; and user-specific data may have an individual fuzzy set. Processor 104, for example, may compare an individual fuzzy set with each of first fuzzy set and second fuzzy set, as described above, and classify a subject to either, both, or neither of first job description nor second job description. Machine-learning methods as described throughout may, in a non-limiting example, generate coefficients used in fuzzy set equations as described above, such as without limitation x, c, and σ of a Gaussian set as described above, as outputs of machine-learning methods. Likewise, subject-specific data may be used indirectly to determine a fuzzy set, as the fuzzy set may be derived from outputs of one or more machine-learning models that take the subject-specific data directly or indirectly as inputs. Although an exemplary application for fuzzy set matching is described above, fuzzy set matching may be used for any classifications or associations described within this disclosure.

Now referencing FIG. 7 , a method 700 for applicant scoring. Step 705 of method 700 includes receiving a user-associated data set to be stored on a resource data storage system. In an embodiment user-associated data set may be accessed on the resource data storage system by authorized users, such as validators, future employers, the user, or the like. User-associated data set may be consistent with any user-associated data set as discussed in this disclosure. In some embodiments, user-associated data set may include visual content. In some embodiments, the user associated data set may include a verification.

With continued reference to FIG. 7 , step 710 of method 700 includes parsing the user-associated data set into a keyword record. Keyword record may be consistent with any keyword record as discussed in this disclosure. This may be implemented as disclosed with reference to FIGS. 1-6 , above. In some embodiments, parsing the user-associated data may include using a machine learning module to generate a keyword record, wherein the machine learning module comprises a keyword classifier. In some embodiments, the keyword classifier is trained using keyword classifier training data comprising a plurality of previous user-associated data sets. In some embodiments, the keyword classifier may include a neural network.

With continued reference to FIG. 7 , step 715 of method 700 includes generating a user metric as a function of the keyword record. This may be implemented as disclosed with reference to FIGS. 1-6 , above. Step 715 includes identifying at least a negative factor in the keyword record. Negative factors may be consistent with any negative factor as discussed in this disclosure. Keyword record may be a sum of the weights of both the negative and positive factors. This may be implemented as disclosed with reference to FIGS. 1-6 , above. Step 715 of method 700 also includes adjusting the plurality of weighted values as a function of the at least a negative factor. In an embodiment, negative factor score may be subtracted from the total score of the user metric. Alternatively or additionally, negative factor may be a multiplier that decreases the total score of the user metric. For example, a negative factor may be weighted as 0.8 such that the total score must decrease by 20% because of the negative factor. User metric may be consistent with any user metric as discussed in this disclosure. This may be implemented as disclosed with reference to FIGS. 1-6 , above. In some embodiments, the plurality of weighted values may be further adjusted as a function of a positive factor. This may be implemented as disclosed with reference to FIGS. 1-6 above.

With continued reference to FIG. 7 , step 720 of method 700 includes receiving identification of a posting of a plurality of postings. Postings may be consistent with any posting as discussed in this disclosure. This may be implemented as disclosed with reference to FIGS. 1-6 , above.

With continued reference to FIG. 7 , step 725 of method 700 includes matching the posting of the plurality of postings to a user as a function of the user metric. Matching a posting may be consistent with any of the matching as discussed in this disclosure. This may be implemented as disclosed with reference to FIGS. 1-6 , above.

With continued reference to FIG. 7 , in some embodiments, method 700 may include generating a keyword record using a language processing module. This may be implemented as disclosed with reference to FIGS. 1-6 above. In some embodiments, method 700 may further include verifying the user associated data set. In some embodiments, verifying the user associated data set may include transmitting the user associated data set to a validator and receiving a verification. In some embodiments, the verification may be digitally signed. This verification step may be implemented as disclosed with reference to FIGS. 1-6 above. In some embodiments, method 700 may further include a step of storing the user metric on an immutable sequential listing. This may be implemented as disclosed with reference to FIGS. 1-6 above.

It is to be noted that any one or more of the aspects and embodiments described herein may be conveniently implemented using one or more machines (e.g., one or more computing devices that are utilized as a user computing device for an electronic document, one or more server devices, such as a document server, etc.) programmed according to the teachings of the present specification, as will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the computer art. Appropriate software coding can readily be prepared by skilled programmers based on the teachings of the present disclosure, as will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the software art. Aspects and implementations discussed above employing software and/or software modules may also include appropriate hardware for assisting in the implementation of the machine executable instructions of the software and/or software module.

Such software may be a computer program product that employs a machine-readable storage medium. A machine-readable storage medium may be any medium that is capable of storing and/or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by a machine (e.g., a computing device) and that causes the machine to perform any one of the methodologies and/or embodiments described herein. Examples of a machine-readable storage medium include, but are not limited to, a magnetic disk, an optical disc (e.g., CD, CD-R, DVD, DVD-R, etc.), a magneto-optical disk, a read-only memory “ROM” device, a random access memory “RAM” device, a magnetic card, an optical card, a solid-state memory device, an EPROM, an EEPROM, and any combinations thereof. A machine-readable medium, as used herein, is intended to include a single medium as well as a collection of physically separate media, such as, for example, a collection of compact discs or one or more hard disk drives in combination with a computer memory. As used herein, a machine-readable storage medium does not include transitory forms of signal transmission.

Such software may also include information (e.g., data) carried as a data signal on a data carrier, such as a carrier wave. For example, machine-executable information may be included as a data-carrying signal embodied in a data carrier in which the signal encodes a sequence of instruction, or portion thereof, for execution by a machine (e.g., a computing device) and any related information (e.g., data structures and data) that causes the machine to perform any one of the methodologies and/or embodiments described herein.

Examples of a computing device include, but are not limited to, an electronic book reading device, a computer workstation, a terminal computer, a server computer, a handheld device (e.g., a tablet computer, a smartphone, etc.), a web appliance, a network router, a network switch, a network bridge, any machine capable of executing a sequence of instructions that specify an action to be taken by that machine, and any combinations thereof. In one example, a computing device may include and/or be included in a kiosk.

FIG. 8 shows a diagrammatic representation of one embodiment of a computing device in the exemplary form of a computer system 800 within which a set of instructions for causing a control system to perform any one or more of the aspects and/or methodologies of the present disclosure may be executed. It is also contemplated that multiple computing devices may be utilized to implement a specially configured set of instructions for causing one or more of the devices to perform any one or more of the aspects and/or methodologies of the present disclosure. Computer system 800 includes a processor 804 and a memory 808 that communicate with each other, and with other components, via a bus 812. Bus 812 may include any of several types of bus structures including, but not limited to, a memory bus, a memory controller, a peripheral bus, a local bus, and any combinations thereof, using any of a variety of bus architectures.

Processor 804 may include any suitable processor, such as without limitation a processor incorporating logical circuitry for performing arithmetic and logical operations, such as an arithmetic and logic unit (ALU), which may be regulated with a state machine and directed by operational inputs from memory and/or sensors; processor 804 may be organized according to Von Neumann and/or Harvard architecture as a non-limiting example. Processor 804 may include, incorporate, and/or be incorporated in, without limitation, a microcontroller, microprocessor, digital signal processor (DSP), Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), Complex Programmable Logic Device (CPLD), Graphical Processing Unit (GPU), general purpose GPU, Tensor Processing Unit (TPU), analog or mixed signal processor, Trusted Platform Module (TPM), a floating point unit (FPU), and/or system on a chip (SoC).

Memory 808 may include various components (e.g., machine-readable media) including, but not limited to, a random-access memory component, a read only component, and any combinations thereof. In one example, a basic input/output system 816 (BIOS), including basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer system 800, such as during start-up, may be stored in memory 808. Memory 808 may also include (e.g., stored on one or more machine-readable media) instructions (e.g., software) 820 embodying any one or more of the aspects and/or methodologies of the present disclosure. In another example, memory 808 may further include any number of program modules including, but not limited to, an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, program data, and any combinations thereof.

Computer system 800 may also include a storage device 824. Examples of a storage device (e.g., storage device 824) include, but are not limited to, a hard disk drive, a magnetic disk drive, an optical disc drive in combination with an optical medium, a solid-state memory device, and any combinations thereof. Storage device 824 may be connected to bus 812 by an appropriate interface (not shown). Example interfaces include, but are not limited to, SCSI, advanced technology attachment (ATA), serial ATA, universal serial bus (USB), IEEE 1394 (FIREWIRE), and any combinations thereof. In one example, storage device 824 (or one or more components thereof) may be removably interfaced with computer system 800 (e.g., via an external port connector (not shown)). Particularly, storage device 824 and an associated machine-readable medium 828 may provide nonvolatile and/or volatile storage of machine-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, and/or other data for computer system 800. In one example, software 820 may reside, completely or partially, within machine-readable medium 828. In another example, software 820 may reside, completely or partially, within processor 804.

Computer system 800 may also include an input device 832. In one example, a user of computer system 800 may enter commands and/or other information into computer system 800 via input device 832. Examples of an input device 832 include, but are not limited to, an alpha-numeric input device (e.g., a keyboard), a pointing device, a joystick, a gamepad, an audio input device (e.g., a microphone, a voice response system, etc.), a cursor control device (e.g., a mouse), a touchpad, an optical scanner, a video capture device (e.g., a still camera, a video camera), a touchscreen, and any combinations thereof. Input device 832 may be interfaced to bus 812 via any of a variety of interfaces (not shown) including, but not limited to, a serial interface, a parallel interface, a game port, a USB interface, a FIREWIRE interface, a direct interface to bus 812, and any combinations thereof. Input device 832 may include a touch screen interface that may be a part of or separate from display 836, discussed further below. Input device 832 may be utilized as a user selection device for selecting one or more graphical representations in a graphical interface as described above.

A user may also input commands and/or other information to computer system 800 via storage device 824 (e.g., a removable disk drive, a flash drive, etc.) and/or network interface device 840. A network interface device, such as network interface device 840, may be utilized for connecting computer system 800 to one or more of a variety of networks, such as network 844, and one or more remote devices 848 connected thereto. Examples of a network interface device include, but are not limited to, a network interface card (e.g., a mobile network interface card, a LAN card), a modem, and any combination thereof. Examples of a network include, but are not limited to, a wide area network (e.g., the Internet, an enterprise network), a local area network (e.g., a network associated with an office, a building, a campus or other relatively small geographic space), a telephone network, a data network associated with a telephone/voice provider (e.g., a mobile communications provider data and/or voice network), a direct connection between two computing devices, and any combinations thereof. A network, such as network 844, may employ a wired and/or a wireless mode of communication. In general, any network topology may be used. Information (e.g., data, software 820, etc.) may be communicated to and/or from computer system 800 via network interface device 840.

Computer system 800 may further include a video display adapter 852 for communicating a displayable image to a display device, such as display device 836. Examples of a display device include, but are not limited to, a liquid crystal display (LCD), a cathode ray tube (CRT), a plasma display, a light emitting diode (LED) display, and any combinations thereof. Display adapter 852 and display device 836 may be utilized in combination with processor 804 to provide graphical representations of aspects of the present disclosure. In addition to a display device, computer system 800 may include one or more other peripheral output devices including, but not limited to, an audio speaker, a printer, and any combinations thereof. Such peripheral output devices may be connected to bus 812 via a peripheral interface 856. Examples of a peripheral interface include, but are not limited to, a serial port, a USB connection, a FIREWIRE connection, a parallel connection, and any combinations thereof.

The foregoing has been a detailed description of illustrative embodiments of the invention. Various modifications and additions can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention. Features of each of the various embodiments described above may be combined with features of other described embodiments as appropriate in order to provide a multiplicity of feature combinations in associated new embodiments. Furthermore, while the foregoing describes a number of separate embodiments, what has been described herein is merely illustrative of the application of the principles of the present invention. Additionally, although particular methods herein may be illustrated and/or described as being performed in a specific order, the ordering is highly variable within ordinary skill to achieve methods, systems, and software according to the present disclosure. Accordingly, this description is meant to be taken only by way of example, and not to otherwise limit the scope of this invention.

Exemplary embodiments have been disclosed above and illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes, omissions and additions may be made to that which is specifically disclosed herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. 

What is claimed is:
 1. An apparatus for data verification for applicant scoring, the apparatus comprising: at least a processor; and a memory communicatively connected to the at least a processor, the memory containing instructions configuring the at least a processor to: receive a user-associated data set to be stored on a resource data storage system; transmit the user-associated data set to a validator; receive a verification of the user-associated data set from the validator; receive a plurality of postings; and match the validated user-associated data set to a posting of the plurality of postings.
 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the user-associated data set comprises a user-specific historical record.
 3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the validator comprises a data integrity validator, wherein the data integrity validator is configured to validate the user-specific historical record.
 4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the data integrity validator is further configured to validate stored requestor information.
 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the validator is on an immutable sequential listing.
 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the memory contains instructions further configuring the at least a processor to transmit a validation request to the validator.
 7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the verification comprises a digital signature.
 8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the memory contains instructions further configuring the at least a processor to authenticate the digital signature of the verification using a data integrity validator.
 9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the verification comprises a private key that is configured to be decrypted with a public key.
 10. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the memory contains instructions further configuring the at least a processor to: generate a user metric of the user-associated data set; and match the posting of the plurality of postings to a user as a function of the user metric of the user-associated data set.
 11. A method for data verification for applicant scoring, the method comprising: receiving, using at least a processor, a user-associated data set to be stored on a resource data storage system; transmitting, using the at least a processor, the user-associated data set to a validator; receiving, using the at least a processor, a verification of the user-associated data set from the validator; receiving, using the at least a processor, a plurality of postings; and matching, using the at least a processor, the validated user-associated data set to a posting of the plurality of postings.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the user-associated data set comprises a user-specific historical record.
 13. The method of claim 12, further comprising: validating, using a data integrity validator, the user-specific historical record.
 14. The method of claim 13, further comprising: validating, using the data integrity validator, stored requestor information.
 15. The method of claim 11, wherein the validator is on an immutable sequential listing.
 16. The method of claim 11, further comprising: transmitting, using the at least a processor, a validation request to the validator.
 17. The method of claim 11, wherein the verification comprises a digital signature.
 18. The method of claim 17, further comprising: authenticating, using a data integrity validator, the digital signature of the verification.
 19. The method of claim 11, wherein the verification comprises a private key that is configured to be decrypted with a public key.
 20. The method of claim 11, further comprising: generating, using the at least a processor, a user metric of the user-associated data set; and matching, using the at least a processor, the posting of the plurality of postings to a user as a function of the user metric of the user-associated data set. 